Back to top

Image: Bigstock

Should Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) Be on Your Investing Radar?

Read MoreHide Full Article

Looking for broad exposure to the Large Cap Blend segment of the US equity market? You should consider the Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL - Free Report) , a passively managed exchange traded fund launched on December 23, 2014.

The fund is sponsored by Invesco. It has amassed assets over $751.59 million, making it one of the average sized ETFs attempting to match the Large Cap Blend segment of the US equity market.

Why Large Cap Blend

Companies that find themselves in the large cap category typically have a market capitalization above $10 billion. They tend to be stable companies with predictable cash flows and are usually less volatile than mid and small cap companies.

Blend ETFs are aptly named, since they tend to hold a mix of growth and value stocks, as well as show characteristics of both kinds of equities.

Costs

When considering an ETF's total return, expense ratios are an important factor, and cheaper funds can significantly outperform their more expensive counterparts in the long term if all other factors remain equal.

Annual operating expenses for this ETF are 0.2%, putting it on par with most peer products in the space.

It has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.73%.

Sector Exposure and Top Holdings

ETFs offer a diversified exposure and thus minimize single stock risk but it is still important to delve into a fund's holdings before investing. Most ETFs are very transparent products and many disclose their holdings on a daily basis.

This ETF has heaviest allocation to the Information Technology sector -- about 11.8% of the portfolio. Energy and Materials round out the top three.

Looking at individual holdings, Lumentum Holdings Inc (LITE) accounts for about 0.84% of total assets, followed by Ciena Corp (CIEN) and Millicom International Cellular Sa (TIGO).

The top 10 holdings account for about 6.1% of total assets under management.

Performance and Risk

EQAL seeks to match the performance of the Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index before fees and expenses. The Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index is composed of securities in the Russell 1000 Index and is equally weighted across nine sector groups with each security within the sector receiving equal weight.

The ETF return is roughly 6.23% so far this year and was up about 24.83% in the last one year (as of 04/06/2026). In the past 52-week period, it has traded between $41.38 and $57.84.

The ETF has a beta of 0.94 and standard deviation of 14.99% for the trailing three-year period, making it a medium risk choice in the space. With about 994 holdings, it effectively diversifies company-specific risk.

Alternatives

Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF carries a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), which is based on expected asset class return, expense ratio, and momentum, among other factors. Thus, EQAL is a sufficient option for those seeking exposure to the Style Box - Large Cap Blend area of the market. Investors might also want to consider some other ETF options in the space.

The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and the Vanguard 500 Index Fund ETF Shares (VOO) track a similar index. While iShares Core S&P 500 ETF has $724.77 billion in assets, Vanguard 500 Index Fund ETF Shares has $831.34 billion. IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% and VOO charges 0.03%.

Bottom-Line

Retail and institutional investors increasingly turn to passively managed ETFs because they offer low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency; these kind of funds are also excellent vehicles for long term investors.

To learn more about this product and other ETFs, screen for products that match your investment objectives and read articles on latest developments in the ETF investing universe, please visit Zacks ETF Center.

Zacks' 7 Best Strong Buy Stocks (New Research Report)

Valued at $99, click below to receive our just-released report predicting the 7 stocks that will soar highest in the coming month.

Click Here, It's Really Free

Published in